Good of the group
Cooperation
Involvement from citizens is key for success of the group.
Quote uses phrases like "First Duty'', and "General Good"
Group Needs Exceed Individual Needs
My Position:
Agree Mostly, but i believe liberty is an important aspect, people need to watch out for themselves.
The decisions we make and the way we live our lives are the foundations for our economic and political ideologies. The source tells us that it must be the first duty of each citizen to work for the general good. The author believes that the group, or society as a whole, should be of the utmost importance, this is called collectivism. I believe that a person should have complete control over his or her own life. The citizens should be focused on doing things fitting to their lifestyle, and working out their own salvation. This would ensure that the needs of each individual would be met. Collectivism tells us that we need to work together in order to be successful, but if everyone is working to better their own lives, this would mean society would be operating in an orderly fashion, and the needs of the group are met. With a collective society they also adopt collective rights, which means they must take away the freedom of the individual.
Competition is a
critical point of individualism; it makes people want to achieve more than
others. Everyone wants to prove something, and it not only drives them to work
and sustain themselves, it also helps to benefit society. Having competition
with the free market greatly increases efficiency in the workplace, hence
increasing production. Having the ability to compete also brings out the creativity
in people. Both collectivism, and individualism focus on the
"good" of the people. When people are working to do the best they
can, they're also creating new ways to do things, and giving different
perspectives on ideas. With all of this happening, its helping society to
better itself, and the needs of the group are met. This phenomena is exactly
what Adam Smith wrote about in, "The Wealth Of Nations." He suggested
that as each individual strove to better benefit themselves, they we're being
led by an, "Invisible Hand" which created prosperity for everyone
without knowingly doing so.
Freedom of
choice is also a powerful aspect of an individualistic society. Everyone on
this planet is different, and we all have varying degrees of success. The source tells us that the activities of the individual may not clash with the interests of the whole, although a diverse and multi faceted society can be the best thing for the whole Take an iron worker
and a particle physicist for example. In a collective environment, they would
be looked at equally, although in reality they have very different needs, and
require different resources in order to be successful. Each Individual has a
different skill set, which can be utilized to achieve a "common
good", without being conformed to fit a set social structure, this is what
makes individualism so powerful.
The nature of a
person can have tremendous effects on their surroundings, from the morals they
follow, to their day-to-day routine. In a collective environment it’s presumed
that the people are incapable of taking care of themselves, that’s why the
government has so much control over them. Someone who is motivated to
accomplish something has a very dramatic impact on others around them. The source tells us that people are obligated to contribute to the group in every way they can, this suggests that without co-operation from the people, society would fail. People naturally want to succeed, and usually do things that help improve their lives, while some make poor choices which can also be beneficial in a way. Bad decisions have bad outcomes, and when people see the consequences they learn to avoid such decisions.
Its extremely difficult to pinpoint exactly what makes a group successful. Choice is what the people desire, and when given opportunities they can do amazing things for the betterment of the whole, without having to be one and the same. Rights for the individual are absolutely necessary when looking at what makes society flourish. Without rights, people are defenceless against oppressive government control which often exploits peoples skills to use for their own advantage. Overall the most fundamental aspect of society, are actually the individuals who live within it, and they have the power to do what is necessary.
Good views and writing
ReplyDeleteI like your second paragraph, it is a very valid point.
ReplyDeleteIn your sentence that ends with the words "...the needs of the group are met." You are discussing a theory called the invisible hand. This is directly associated with capitalism and Adam Smiths theories. He basically came up with the same idea that you area stating.
ReplyDeleteIn your next paragraph where you say " Competition is a critical point in individualism..." I would change it from "point in individualism" to "critical principle of individualism". It makes more sense to use the vocabulary from class. On your diploma this will go further than using similar vocabulary. It shows the markers that you understand the content rather than you sort of remembering the content a little.
The question to what extent should we embrace the ideology presented should be addressed. From reading your essay it seems we should completely not embrace it and swing to the other end of the spectrum, but can it go too far?
I think that this has the potential to be a good essay.